Means-testing is an insidious way of destroying the value of any social program and opening it up to criticism not otherwise applicable.

> The case against means testing. Programs that use it can impose inordinate burdens on the people they’re trying to help. vox.com/2021/10/15/22722418/me

> The Absolute Simplest Explanation for America’s Supply Chain Woes. Snarled ports. Empty store shelves. Panicky Christmas shoppers. It all flows from one issue. slate.com/business/2021/10/sup

Looking at this from a software-development perspective, it all seems incredibly obvious to me:

* Optimize for efficiency and you get a brittle, non-portable solution tied to a particular execution regime

* Optimize for resilience and portability and you lose efficiency

Cheap, fast, or correct. Pick two…

Workers: I don't want to work for low wages during a pandemic for shitty bosses with poor leadership skills to serve overly entitled customers who won't even do me the courtesy of wearing a fucking mask

Bosses: We don't want to pay our workers more or hire new people because our business model is based around skeleton crews full of minimum wage workers in order to be viable

Dozens of articles every day: What's behind the worker shortage? Is the social safety net too generous?

Politics, 2022, Trump 

> Donald Trump is doing everything he can to hurt Republican chances in 2022. cnn.com/2021/10/14/politics/do

> "If we don't solve the Presidential Election Fraud of 2020 (which we have thoroughly and conclusively documented), Republicans will not be voting in '22 or '24. It is the single most important thing for Republicans to do."

Related to earlier posts today, in 2016 a report predicted Moore's Law would be dead by 2021, because we wouldn't be able to fit any more transistors on a chip. techrepublic.com/article/moore

It's 2021 and the boffins are waffling about the end of Moore's Law, because chips don't have to be two-dimensional. cacm.acm.org/magazines/2021/2/

And now I've come to the point in my little essay where I post a link for you to read, drop the mic, and walk away…

vox.com/recode/22725044/china-

[fin]

Show thread

He also advanced three possible drivers of advanced AI technology arriving that quickly:

1. Moore's Law continues to operate, either because Quantum Computing becomes viable or we find other ways to boost CPU power

2. A breakthrough in AI science

3. An 'Artificial Intelligence Arms Race' between world superpowers.

According to Vinge any one of those factors could produce a Technological Singularity, but he was most concerned about the third.

[contd]

Show thread

Nearly 20 years ago I was at a party in , sipping single-malt scotch with Vinge and talking about various Big Ideas and I asked him if his original timeline still stood, given 2005 was right around the corner.

He replied that 2005 or even 2010 was incredibly unlikely; but 2030 was right on track. (Although he did fudge and say it might occur as late as 2035. And added it might not occur at all, of course, since it was no more than speculation.)

[contd]

Show thread

You see, AI technology in 2021 isn't really creating 'intelligence' as we know it; most Machine Learning applications are operating at the level of insects. The best ML algorithms produce something more equivalent to reflexes than reasoning. A better acronym is 'AS' or 'Artificial Stupidity'.

So, should we stop worrying? Are Vinge's 'Superhuman Intelligences' impossible, or impossibly far away?

From Vinge's paper: "I'll be surprised if this event occurs before 2005 or after 2030."

[contd]

Show thread

'The Singularity' is now a cultural trope. And, aside from some speculation about robot uprisings by the likes of Elon Musk, society has mostly stopped seeing Machine Learning and technology as clear and present dangers. This in a world with armed drones and other trappings of 'The Terminator' made real.

"Alexis, are you monitoring everything we do in this house?"

Yes, AI is everywhere now – but it doesn't actually seem all that 'intelligent'. There's a reason for that…

[contd]

Show thread

In 1993 Computer Scientist and writer Vernor Vinge published a short paper titled, "The Coming Technological Singularity: How to Survive in the Post-Human Era." edoras.sdsu.edu/~vinge/misc/si

Since then 'The Singularity' has become everything from a joke to a pseudo-religion and others became famous by filing off the serial numbers and presenting Vinge's thesis as their own idea. At this point even low-information types have at least seen 'The Terminator' and 'The Matrix'.

[cond]

Apparently Paul McCartney has finally revealed the truth: he is like any other old fart nursing ancient grudges against his old partners and rivals.

> EXCLUSIVE Major buyers face losses as Colombia farmers fail to deliver. reuters.com/world/americas/exc

Maybe when a cup of morning joe costs $15 we'll see people finally admitting we need to do something about

I love a slow weekend morning with nothing I have to do and a good cup of coffee to enjoy not doing it with.

I don't get it. First Google goes all out to destroy RSS, even killing an incredibly popular product to do it, then they announce they are 'resurrecting' RSS by building it into their browser.

? Did they like create a new Googlefied RSS that forces you to watch ads? Or is it a zombified RSS that eats your brains? What?

Oh well, I only use Chrome on my work machine because Jira doesn't work right with Firefox. So who cares?

When your calendar software reminds you, at the same time, that tomorrow is both Columbus Day and Indigenous People's Day and it feels like an entire culture war has been expressed in two alert popups.

Politics, Drug War, White People's Drug 

> A global fight looms over Kratom, a possible opioid alternative. The U.S. government has twice tried to classify kratom as a controlled substance, but public outcry and pushback from Congress thwarted those efforts. politico.com/news/2021/10/09/g

What's going on here? It's simple, really. We have a potentially addictive opioid-like drug NOT being made illegal simply because the majority of its users are middle-aged white people.

Show older